Principal's Supervisory Practices for Teacher Professional Development: Bureaucratic and Professional Perspectives
Author :
Year-Number: 2020-Volume 12, Issue 1
Language : null
Konu :
Abstract
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the opinions of teachers about the supervisory practices of school principals and the approaches they adopt based on the supervision of teaching practice, professional development and evaluation. It is a mixed method study. It was preferred to include samples from different geographical regions and provinces of Turkey in order to increase the level of representativeness of the sample. Accordingly, the research data were collected from the teachers working at public kindergartens, primary schools, secondary schools and high schools in the provinces of Bursa, Gaziantep, Izmir, Antalya, Samsun, Batman and Eskisehir during the spring semester of 2016-2017 academic year. For the qualitative data, the study group consisted of 28 teachers specified through the maximum diversity sampling method. According to the research results, the opinions of the teachers about the supervisory practices differed in three sub-headings and the qualitative findings supported the quantitative ones. In addition, it was concluded that the principals adopted the bureaucratic approach in the supervisory process based on the means of the responses to the questionnaire.
Keywords
- Acheson, K.A., & Waite, D.E. (1998). Foundations in supervision. In F. Gerald & E. Pajak (Ed.). Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 177-180). NY: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
- Achilles, C.M., & Tienken, C.H. (2005). Professional development and educational improvement? In L.W. Hughes (Ed). Current issues in school leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaun Associated, Publishers.
- Arslan, H., & Beytekin, F. (2004). İlköğretim okul müdürleri için eğitim liderliği standartlarının araştırılması [Öz]. Oral presentation in XIII. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, 6-9 Temmuz 2004, Malatya. Accessed from http://www.pegem.net/dosyalar/dokuman/82.pdf.
- Aydın, İ. (2014). Öğretimde denetim. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Balcı, A., Aydın, İ., Yılmaz, K., Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Apaydın, Ç. (2007). Türk eğitim sisteminde ilköğretimin yönetimi ve denetimi: mevcut durum ve yeni perspektifler. In S. Özdemir, H. Bacanlı, & M. Sözer (Ed.). Türkiye’de okul öncesi ve ilköğretim sistemi: temel sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayını.
- Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promotes teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Bowers, D. L. (1999). Teachers’ use of peer observation and feedback as a means of professional development (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California (UMI Number: 9933793).
- Buchberger, F., Campos, B.P., Kallos, D., & Stephenson, J. (Ed.). (2000). Greenpaper on teacher education in Europe: High quality teacher education for high quality education and training [Electronic version]. Accessed from http://tntee.umu.se/publications/greenpaper.html
- Burgaz, B. (1995). İlköğretim kurumlarının denetiminde yeterince yerine getirilmediği görülen bazı denetim rolleri ve nedenleri [Enough in the supervision of primary educational institutions some auditing roles and reason that were mot made]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 127-134.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. Çakmak, E., Akgün, E.Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (6th Edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Carter, S. C. (2001). No Excuses: Lessons from 21 High-performing, high-poverty schools. Washington D.C.: The Heritage Foundation.
- Chao, C-Y., & Dugger, J.C. (1996). A total quality management model for instructional supervision in vocational technical programs. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 33(4), 23-35.
- Cooley, V. E., & Shen, J. (2003). School accountability and professional job responsibilities: A perspective from secondary principals. National Association of Secondary Principal’s Bulletin, 87, 10-25.
- Costs, A.L., Garmston, R., & Lambert, L. (1988). Evaluation of teaching: The cognitive development view. In S.J. Stanley & W. J. Popham (Ed.). Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success (pp. 145-172). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Deniz, Ü., & Erdener, M. A. (2016). Okul müdürlerinin sergilediği öğretimsel denetim davranışlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. In Tüfekçi, Ö. K. (Ed.). Sosyal bilimlerde stratejik araştırmalar (pp. 69-81). Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Erdem, A. R. (2006). Eğitimin denetimsel temelleri. In V. Sönmez (Ed.). Eğitim bilimine giriş (pp. 243–260), Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
- Glanz, J. (1998). Roles, responsibilities, and relationships. In F. Gerald & E. Pajak (Ed.). Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 375-396). NY: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
- Glickman, C., Gordon, S. and Ross-Gordon, J. (2007). Supervision and instructional leadership - A developmental approach. Pearson Education Inc.
- Glickman, C.D., Gordon, S.P., & J.M. Ross-Gordon (2014). Supervision an instructional leadership: A developmental approach. Boston: MaAllyn and Bacon.
- Goldhammer, R., Anderson, R. H., & Krajewskı, R. J. (1980). Clinical supervision: special methods for the supervision of teachers (2nd ed.). New-York: Holt/Rinehart/Wiston.
- Gürbüz, S., & F., Şahin (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
- Hanson, E. M. (1996). Instructional behavior and organizational behavior, (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Harris, B. M. (1998). Paradigms and parameters of supervision in education. In F. Gerald & E. Pajak (Ed.). Handbook of research on school supervision (pp. 1-34). NY: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
- Hillyer, D. (2005). A case study of teacher evaluation and supervision at a high performing urban elementary school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern, California.
- Ivankova, N., & Kawamura, Y. (2010). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie (Ed.). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.) (pp. 581-611). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Lunenburg, F., & Irby, B. (2011). Instructional strategies to facilitate learning. The International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(1), 20-21.
- Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Wanda, M.T., & Zimpher, N. L. (1986). An examination of three theoretical perspectives on supervision: Perceptions of preservice field supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1(2), 83-99.
- MoNE (2018). 2023 Vizyon Belgesi. Accessed from http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr
- Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Engin, M. (2012). Çağdaş eğitim denetimi modeli olarak öğretimsel denetimin Türk eğitim sisteminde uygulanabilirliği [Implementability instructional supervision as a contemporary educational supervision model in Turkish educational system]. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 5(1), 131142.
- Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2009). Paydaşların gözüyle Türkiye’de eğitim denetimi sorunsalı [Öz]. Oral presentation in IV. Ulusal Eğitim Yönetimi Kongresi, 14-15 Mayıs 2009, Denizli. Accessed from https://www.pegem.net/akademi/kongrebildiri_detay.aspx?id=48633
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (Second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
- Nolan, J. F., & Hoover, L. A. (2008). Teacher supervision and evaluation: Theory into practice (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Oliva, P. F., & Pawlas, G., E. (2001). Supervision for today’s school (6th ed.). New York: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
- Peplinski, R.M. (2009). Pirincipals’ and teachers’ perceptions of teacher supervision. PHD Thesis, College University of Nevada, LasVegas
- Range, B. (2010). Instructional supervision: The principal's role in modeling Professional development standard. The International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 5(4), 1-4.
- Reitzug, U.C. (1997). Images of principal as instruction leadership: from super-vision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12, 356-366.
- Sarıyar, Y. (1997). İlköğretim okullarında branş öğretmenlerinin denetiminde kullanılmakta olan teftiş formunun ilköğretim müfettişleri ve branş öğretmenlerinde değerlendirilmesi (Unpublished master's thesis). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elâzığ.
- Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2000). Alternative approaches to supervision: Cases from the Field. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 15(3), 212-35.
- Tesfaw, T.A., & Hofman, R.H. (2012). Instructional supervision and its relationship with professional development: Perception of private and government secondary school teachers in Addis Ababa. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Groningen, Netherlands.
- Topçu, İ. (2010). Devlet ve özel ilköğretim okullarında yöneticilerin öğretimin denetimi görevini yerine getirme biçimleri [Supervisory and evolutionary styles of school administrators in Turkish state and primary schools]. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 34(2),31-39.
- Tucker, P. D. (2003). The principalship: Renewed call for instructional leadership. In L. Duke, M. Grogan, PD Tucker, and WF Heineke (Ed.). Educational leadership in the age of accountability: The Virginia experience (pp. 97-113). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Wanzare, Z. (2012). Instructional Supervision in Public Secondary Schools in Kenya. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 40 (2), 188-216.
- Yücel, H., & Toprakçı, E. (2009). Öğretmen denetiminin ihmal edilen boyutu olarak eğitsel denetim [Öz]. Oral presentation in Uluslararası Katılımlı Ulusal Eğitim Denetimi Sempozyumu, 22-23 Haziran 2009, Türk Eğitimciler ve Müfettişler Sendikası, Ankara.
- Zepeda, S. J. (2007). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (2nd ed.). NY: Eye on Education.
